|
Tras un denso trabajo de recopilación científica y síntesis, hemos decidido,
publicar el presente estudio sobre la base de exponer detalladamente toda la
información “científica” y “tecnológica” disponible en este momento.
Toda la línea expuesta, analiza más de 120 patentes de TESLA, así como la
energía del punto "0", la lógica de radiofrecuencia diferencial y finalmente los
principios científicos de la generación cuántica de energía electromagnética,
o “plasma electromagnético.”
Dado el gran volúmen de datos, documentación científica analizada y estudios
complementarios, bibliografía, etc...podemos afirmar, que estamos en
condiciones de producir dispositivos de energía libre viablles y eficientes,
que en este momento, están siendo desarrollados por diferentes
equipos distribuídos a lo largo de toda la geografía mundial.
“II.Exposición detallada.”
1.La base lógica de la energía libre: “Electromagnetismo y Radiofrecuencia.”
Recientemente, expusimos el marco de la “unificación de la física cuántica
diferencial.
En dicha exposición,” señalábamos que:
La unificación nos ayudará a resolver el fenómeno de la
superconductividad a altas energías. La clave reside en la
interacción deenergías (electromagnetismo, interacciones débiles e
interacciones fuertes). Dr.Rafael LópezGuerrero, I.R.C.A.I,
www.ircai.eu
Respecto a la radiofrecuencia, sabemos que existe una lógica que
interelaciona, paquetes de datos
en frecuencias, resonancias y armónicos, y que ésta a su vez,
interactúa con los impulsos electromagnéticos.
En el Universo, la energía se transmite mediante paquetes de datos.
Esa transmisión implica en sí misma, una lógica inteligente.
Lógica de frecuencias y electromagnetismo.
Todos los paquetes de datos, contienen una estructura idéntica coherente
con laforma helicoidal:
Frecuencias , resonancias y armónicos que interactúan con las fuerzas
expuestas en el diagrama de unificación de la física.
De hecho, no es casualidad que la extrapolación teórica muestra que
las tres fuerzas del modelo estándar (la interacción fuerte y las unificadas
débil y electromagnética) tienen más o menos la misma intensidad a
energías muy altas, y que la coincidencia mejora añadiendo la
“supersimetría.” Ello, demuestra :
1º.Que los principios de Tesla, son correctos: Tesla estaba en lo cierto:
Las energías libres, implican que el universo está en equilibrio.
2º.Que toda radiofrecuencia puede trnsformarse en electromagnetismo,
y éste en aquella de forma simple y lógica.
3º.Que la energía del punto "0" no es otra cosa que la transformación
de paquetes de datos en energía y viceversa.
4º.Que podemos ineractuar en el proceso conociendo las leyes básicas
de las tres interacciones, por lo que la supersimetría implica que el
espaciotiempo es relativo a la escala de curvatura de frecuencias de KönigGuerrero.
5ºPor tanto, la lógica de parámetros de datos de lainteracción entre rdiofrecuencia
y energía de interacción, sigue los mismos patrones de la lógica del equilibrio de
fuerzas del universo.
2.Patrones de replicación cuántica.
Una de las consecuencias de lo anteriormente expuesto, es la capacidad de
replicación cuántica de cualesquiera
paquetes de datos, y por tanto, la formulación del principio de replicación por
“supresión de interacciones.”
“Toda estructura de paquetes de datos procedente del universo, puede replicarse a
escala cuántica desde un punto B a un punto C, partiendo de un patrón de estructura
de datos A, que denominamos matriz originaria.”
De esta forma, tendríamos el siguiente esquema:
De esta forma tenemos que las energías de interacción por supresión
generan curvatura KG
(ver diagrama de curvaturas KönigGuerrero, tendríamos que:
Podemos generar aperturas energéticas que curvan el espaciotiempo,
utilizando el paradigma
de la energíamasa. Dicho de forma coloquial: Podemos replicar de forma
ilimitada, “paquetes de energía” partiendo de un “punto "0" ”
Podemos replicar paquetes de energía desde un punto "0"
3.Analizando las aplicaciones técnicas:
La lógica del motor de energía del punto "0".
Como puede verse, pueden replicarse, "clonarse" paquetes de energía,
desde el punto "0", siguiendo la lógica arriba expuesta.
Los siguientes diagramas, muestran la mayor eficiencia en la gestion
energética del punto "0".
Tal y como demuestran T.Bearden y K.Moore en System Efficiency
( http:www.cheniere.orgtechpapersCOPvsEFF23.pdf )
and Coefficient of Performance (COP) of Symmetric and Asymmetric
Maxwellian Systems
http:www.cheniere.orgtechpapersCOPvsEFF23.pdf
4.Demostración de viabilidad de las tecnologías TESLA:
Tal y como señala Tom Bearden, reproducimos el texto íntegro de la carta:
MEG AharonovBohm Effect, Watergas, Negative Energy, Negative
Probabilities, Precursor Engineering, Extending the Scientific
Method, and EM Limitations
Tom Bearden
7 April 2008
Dear (Correspondent),
I very much appreciate your kindness in sending me the
information, and the new work with polarized daylight is very
significant indeed!
One of these days I hope to get Prof. Michael Berry to take a
look at how we use the AharonovBohm effect in our patented
Motionless Electromagnetic Generator (MEG). We are able to use the
AharonovBohm effect to first energize the surrounding vacuum
outside the transformer core with curlfree Apotential, then
perturb the core normally so as to send out Afield perturbations
into that energized external vacuum (into its Apotential). From
the perturbed local Afield vacuum the MEG receives back (from all
directions) excess Efield energy pulses by the simple equation
dAdt – E. The result is that the local altered vacuum – when
subsequently perturbed – then sends back free Efield energy to
our unit as an extra, free energy input from the active vacuum
environment. By insuring some coherence in the received Efield
signals, we also insure that the return excess energy input is
usable EM energy from the altered local vacuumspacetime. On
my website, www.cheniere.org http:www.cheniere.org, there is
a set of drawings of how the AB process in the MEG actually works,
so that one can see it visually. See
http:www.cheniere.org
.
As you know, force fields exist only in matter, since mass is a
component of force by the simple equation F ddt(mv). Placing m
0 in that equation shows that in massless space, “force” does
not exist. So instead of EM force fields in massless space,
instead there exist precursor “conditions of spacetime” as pointed
out by Nobelist Feynman. What we call “EM force”, then, rigorously
is the ongoing interaction of that “precursor field” with
charged matter q.
As the great John Wheeler points out, “Space acts on matter,
telling it how to move. In turn, matter reacts back on space,
telling it how to curve.” [Wheeler's principle, as stated in W.
Misner, K.S. Thorne, and J.A. Wheeler, Gravitation, W.H. Freeman
and Co., San Francisco, 1973, p. 5].
Wheeler also pointed out the dominance of the interacting
spacetime with matter and effects in matter. Quoting:
“…elementary particles represent a percentagewise almost
completely negligible change in the locally violent conditions
that characterize the vacuum...In other words, elementary
particles do not form a really basic starting point for the
description of nature. Instead, they represent a firstorder
correction to vacuum physics.”
So the AharonovBohm effect (together with many others) shows
that it is possible to directly condition or change (or
“engineer”) the local spacetime itself, and then use it to affect
the physical system embedded in that altered local spacetime.
What we call “force” is the ongoing interaction of the “condition
of spacetime itself” with matter.
The bottom line is that (1) the vacuumspacetime can first be
preconditioned locally (precursive engineering), without using
force or work (which is translation of force), and (2) then
the altered and energized vacuumspacetime can be stimulated to
provide excess EM energy freely back to the system. The system
then has TWO energy inputs: (1) the one we pay to make, and (2)
the one the surrounding activated vacuum gives us for free. So,
like a windmill in a free EM energy wind, our unit can exhibit
COP1.0, even though its energy efficiency is always less than 100%.
We are presently awaiting funding for our MEG (there are five
inventors) and when we receive that funding we will then strongly
move to put legitimate COP1.0 electrical power generating systems
on the market. That will require about a year and a half of very
intense final research and development to better and automatically
control the coherence of the return signals, etc. I’m very much
hoping I live to see the MEG on the market and being used worldwide.
And as you know, once one has COP of 3.0 or so, then with clamped
positive feedback of part of the output, one can produce an
“asymmetric” system which is “selfpowered” (more correctly, with
all its input energy freely received from the locally excited and
interacting vacuum).
So “energy from the vacuum” is no more eerie than a common
windmill or solar power cell array. Given the necessary input
energy from the active surrounding environment, the system is
legitimately permitted to function as an analogue to a common heat
pump – which has an efficiency of only about 50%, but which
normally has a COP 3.0 to 4.0. In short, the heat pump wastes
half of all its input energy from whatever source, but it receives
so much excess energy from its activated environment that it can
still output more heat energy than the electrical energy the
operator himself pays to input. No violation of thermodynamics or
of physics is involved. Instead, there is involved just a way to
directly and freely alter the local environment so it is
energized, and then to trigger it into sending free energy
into one’s system to be collected and power the loads.
Note that such asymmetrical overunity electrical systems are
specifically excluded from the normal electrical engineering
model. The Heaviside equations were deliberately symmetrized in
1892 by Lorentz, at the instigation of J. P. Morgan, just prior to
the formation of modern electrical engineering. It was done
specifically to remove the asymmetrical “energy from the
active vacuum” systems that Nikola Tesla had discovered. Tesla had
labeled them as “energy from the active medium” systems. Tesla had
just destroyed the dream of Morgan and Edison for their great DC
power empire (a DC power plant every two miles in cities and
builtup areas) by putting in practical AC generators at Niagara
Falls. Since AC could be transmitted fairly efficiently for long
distances and DC could not, then with AC power one did not require
most of those expensive DC power plants. So the world adopted AC
power stations and transmission. With that blow to his dreams of
empire, the ruthless Morgan was immediately determined to destroy
Tesla utterly and his backer Westinghouse also. And he thoroughly
accomplished both goals.
Here is just one statement by Tesla of what he intended to do.
Quoting:
"Ere many generations pass, our machinery will be driven by a
power obtainable at any point in the universe. This idea is not
novel... We find it in the delightful myth of Antheus, who derives
power from the earth; we find it among the subtle speculations of
one of your splendid mathematicians...Throughout space there is
energy. Is this energy static or kinetic? If static our hopes are
in vain; if kinetic – and this we know it is, for certain – then
it is a mere question of time when men will succeed in attaching
their machinery to the very wheelwork of nature." [Nikola Tesla,
in a speech in New York to the American Institute of Electrical
Engineers, 1891. Quoted from back cover of his biography, Margaret
Cheney, Tesla: Man Out of Time].
During an address in 1897 Tesla stated:
“We have to evolve means for obtaining energy from stores
which are forever inexhaustible, to perfect methods which do not
imply consumption and waste of any material whatever. I now feel
sure that the realization of that idea is not far off. ...the
possibilities of the development I refer to, namely, that of the
operation of engines on any point of the earth by the energy of
the medium...” [Nikola Tesla, during an address in 1897
commemorating his installation of generators at Niagara Falls.].
Sadly, my personal physical condition is so bad I cannot travel
(33 years of biological warfare modified mycoplasma poisoning,
that my own Government folks made secretly back in the late 50s in
a joint program with Canada, and then sprayed it (in Florida and
several places in Canada) for testing its dispersion. Its strength
was reduced by 2000 times, which was supposed to make it “safe” –
about like being “just a little bit pregnant”. The spraying passed
it into the mosquito population as carriers and thus unleashed
this new and terrible malady.
I caught that crazy mess in 1968 while stationed in Canada at
Camp Valcartier as the U.S. Liaison officer to the Canadian
Armament Research & Development Team. With that awful stuff buried
inside my red blood cells, the hemoglobin hardened and one’s blood
could simply not take on and transport sufficient oxygen. I was
hospitalized three times in Canada and almost died. Tests back
then revealed nothing. So No one knew what I had for 33 years,
while it slowly damaged everything in my body. I lived thanks to a
very crazy procedure that the French doctors in Quebec performed,
which – we know today – placed the organisms into a sort of
prolonged hibernation. They resurged in my body in 2001, again
almost killing me and giving me a heart attack. By sheer
coincidence, my family doctor (as a young doctor) had treated some
of the Army sergeants on that program, and found out about the
crazy BWmodified mycoplasma and the unique test to identify the
organism. He had the test in his own lab, and gave it to me – and
it proved that indeed I had the BWmodified mycoplasma in my red
blood cells.
So finally my bizarre ailment was positively identified by direct
and decisive test at the end of 2001 after my heart attack. Then
I spent 2002 as my “year on antibiotics” to get the crazy
mycoplasma organisms when they came out of the red blood cells as
a host cell was dying after its normal lifespan of three or four
months. We got rid of the mycoplasma at long last, but everything
inside me – brain, nervous system, organs, blood vessels, muscle
system, skeletal system and joints –was damaged irretrievably by
the 33 years of steady damage.
So I can stand about two minutes, walk about 100 feet, but cannot
travel. But thankfully I can drive locally and care for my beloved
wife after her stroke followed by two heart attacks.
Anyway, thank you very much for the information; Prof. Michael
Berry is one of my scientific heroes and I would dearly like to
hear him in person at that conference!
I previously sent a writeup back to IOP, which may be of some
interest to you. It opens up a vast new area of science by
extending the present scientific method itself. Please note that
negative energy was arbitrarily removed from quantum field theory
and from the Dirac electron theory by artifice in order not to
have to face the awesome implications of “negative probabilities”
mathematically. By adding back the negative energy (e.g., as per
the important and brilliant work of Prof. Dan Solomon) into
quantum field theory and Dirac electron theory, then one suddenly
is able to directly engineer the precursor spacetimevacuum flux
itself, before it interacts with matter to form forces and force
fields.
By engineering and using negative energy from the vacuum, one is
also directly engineering “negative probabilities”, and that is a
dramatic extension to the present scientific method. One can
directly change (and even “dissolve”) any “positive observed state
or condition in matter or material systems” (which “observed
state” is just a state with 100 percent positive probability when
one considers the underlying spacetime and vacuum processes with
positive energy only). By adding negative probabilities, one
reduces the 100% positive probability (the observed state or
condition) to less than 100%. With sufficient negative probability
added to the ongoing vacuumcharge interactions, the net
probability of the observed HOH state can be reduced to zero –
its total absence.
So with a little judicially used negative energy stimulated in
water, one can cause the water’s observed water molecule’s HOH
force bonds to just fall apart and disappear (in their ongoing
interaction with the locally nowaltered negative energy
vacuum and its negative probabilities). In that way, one gets H2
and O2 gas nearly freely, paying only a little switching and
control costs to condition the vacuum properly (the vacuum
conditioning itself is forcefree and workfree). With precursor
engineering and negative energynegative probabilities, one does
not have to pay for tearing the HOH bonds apart by brute force,
as is done in normal positive energypositive probabilities
electrolysis.
Applied to cancer, e.g., one also can reverse the cancerous
physical condition (such as that cancer in the human body) as
already shown by Professor Kanzius, with validation in animal
experiments already performed successfully. See
http:en.wikipedia.orgwikiJohnKanzius.
If Professor Kanzius can avoid suppression by the big
pharmaceuticals, then with followon successful human trials and
FDA approval, we will also finally have a totally different kind
of “positive cure” for cancer. And in theory, the use of
negative energy and negative probabilities method can be adapted
to cure any other illness or undesirable physical condition as
well – including such conditions as HIV, diabetes, etc. – and
eventually even mental retardation and reversal of aging.
Meanwhile, I’ve worked with several inventors who used (and are
using) negative energy to show that, by preconditioning the local
vacuum prior to its interaction with charged matter in our EM
systems, then true “excess energy freely from the vacuum” systems
can be built and utilized. Producing sharp gradient pulses of
normal EM energy across little regions of the vacuum will “pop
out” some of those filler electrons from the Dirac Sea (that is
actually the Lenz Law effect), leaving behind the emptied Dirac
holes. These are negative massenergy matter (negative mass energy
electrons, not positrons!), and so one has produced a sort of
“negative energy froth” in the local Dirac Sea. The Dirac holes
are actually what is being sought as “dark matter” by our
astrophysicists, and as source charges their associated
concomitant negative energy EM fields are what is being sought as
“dark energy”.
So the “dark matter” our astrophysicists are so desperately
seeking is easily evoked on the lab bench and studied directly.
Dark matter simply consists of Dirac holes, remaining after one
has popped out their filler electrons with sharp gradient pulses,
leaving behind the holes (again, they are negative massenergy
electrons, not positrons). So Dark Matter is actually an
engineering of the local spacetimevacuum itself; specifically, of
the Dirac Sea. As source charges, these negative mass energy
electrons (Dirac Sea Holes) emit negative energy photons, so that
their “static fields” are actually negative energy EM fields.
Of course thermodynamically they are also nonequilibrium steady
state (NESS) systems as well, consisting of constant flow of real
photons, whose energy has been extracted from the seething virtual
state vacuum via the broken symmetry of the source dipolarities.
I have one inventor friend (Bedini) who has used negative energy
(dark energy) and Dirac holes (dark matter) in his highly improved
battery charging circuits for 30 years. He is presently bringing
such highly improved battery chargers into production and they
will be going on the market. He also has released the secret of
how he (very practically) evokes and controls such negative energy
phenomenology, and now more than two dozen independent
experimenters worldwide have successfully replicated Bedini
COP1.0 systems.
Presently unknown to the scientific community, our own U.S.
Department of Energy has quietly developed and used a fabrication
(special extrusion) process to form asymmetric permanent
magnets – e.g., physically symmetrical permanent bar magnets but
with deliberately asymmetric field strengths laterally on the two
sides of each magnet – and patented it as a result of a DoE grant
to the inventor. Presently our DoE thus has been very quietly
building and controlling true selfpowering permanent magnet
motors (taking all their input energy from the seething vacuum via
the broken symmetry of the dipole in the asymmetry magnet), while
continuing to hide it from the U.S. President, the Congress, the
scientific community, and the American Public.
To see this, see the following patents:
(a) Vijay K. Chandhok and Baomin Ma. “Method for producing
a noncircular permanent magnet”. United States Patent No.
4,915,891, issued April. 10,1990.
Abstract: A method for producing a noncircular magnet
having asymmetric magnetic properties along axes thereof. A
particle charge of composition from which the magnet is to be
produced is placed in a container, heated and extruded within the
container to compact the particle charge to substantially full
density. The particle charge may include at least one rare earth
element. The particle charge may be extruded through a noncircular
extrusion die, specifically a rectangular die.
(b) For the way the Department of Energy paid to develop
having it done, and had one of the inventors repatent it, see
Vijak K. Chadhok, WO2001084569 A1 “Method for Producing through
Extrusion an Anisotropic Magnet with High Energy Product”,
International Patent, 9 Mar. 2001. Quoting: “This invention was
made with government support under a small business research and
development grant for "A Simple Process to Manufacture Grain
Aligned Permanent Magnets" awarded by the U. S. Department of
Energy (Grant No. DEFG0297ER82313). The Government has certain
rights to this invention.”
(c) Chadhok then got yet another patent himself in 2004. See
Vijak K. Chadhok, “Method for producing through extrusion an
anisotropic magnet with high energy product”, U.S. Patent No.
6,787,083 issued on Sep. 7, 2004.
Abstract: A method for producing an anisotropic magnet
with high energy product through extrusion and, more specifically,
by placing a particle charge of a composition from the which
magnet is to be produced in a noncircular container, heating the
container and particle charge and extruding the container and
particle charge through a noncircular extrusion die in such a
manner that one of the crosssectional axes or dimension of the
container and particle charge is held substantially constant
during the extrusion to compact the particle charge to
substantially full density by mechanical deformation produced
during the extrusion to achieve a magnet with anisotropic magnetic
properties along the axes or dimension thereof and, more
specifically, a high energy product along the transverse of the
smallest crosssectional dimension of the extruded magnet.
So the U.S. Department has had powerful selfpowering permanent
magnet motors since 2001 and has hidden it from the U.S.
President, the Congress, the scientific community, and the
American public.
As you are aware and as was pointed out by Nobelist Lee,
whenever we have a broken symmetry then something previously
virtual has become observable. Every charge is a priori a part
of a dipole, when one also considers its polarized surrounding
vacuum. The “magnetic pole” is actually the “magnetic charge”. In
modern physics, a tiny classical charge is actually two infinite
charges – the bare charge in the middle (infinite charge with
infinite energy) and the surrounding charge of the altered vacuum
(infinite charge with infinite energy). Our instruments peering
through the screening polarized vacuum at the bare charge in the
middle see only a finite difference, and that is the “classical”
finite value of the charge.
It is easy to evoke a proven “free EM energy flow – a real and
free EM energy wind” from the vacuum, whenever one wishes, for a
small sum (such as $10 U.S.). E.g., lay a normal permanent bar
magnet on the bench. Lay an electret on top of it so that the
Efield of the electret is at right angles to the Hfield of the
magnet. Then by the standard Poynting EM energy flow theory in
every EM text in the EM departments of every university, that
silly gadget will then sit there and freely pour out real, usable
Poynting EM energy flow S, given by S E X H.
So getting an everlasting free EM energy wind from our
vacuumspacetime environment is simple and cheap and easy.
But to separately intercept, collect, and (separately) dissipate
some of that “free EM energy wind” energy to power our loads
freely, it requires an asymmetrical “electrical windmill” system.
Well, sadly our EEs have never had such a system even in their
theory; all remaining asymmetrical Maxwellian systems in the
original Heaviside vector equations were deliberately removed by
Lorentz by his symmetrization of the Heaviside equations. So from
the very beginning, our electrical engineers have never been able
to conceive, design, build, and deploy such asymmetrical systems.
And the present standard EE model is not Maxwell’s theory!
Maxwell’s theory is 20 quaternionlike equations in 20 unknowns,
and it contains all sorts of asymmetric EM systems as well as
those highly limited symmetrical systems known to electrical
engineering. Tesla, e.g., was able to deliberately shuttle the
collected potential energy around in a circuit at will, and this
has been clearly shown by a great electrodynamicist, T. Barrett,
one of the pioneers of ultrawideband radar. See T. W. Barrett,
"Tesla's Nonlinear OscillatorShuttleCircuit (OSC) Theory,"
Annales de la Fondation Louis de Broglie, 16(1), 1991, p. 2341.
Barrett shows that EM expressed in quaternions allows shuttling
and storage of potentials in circuits, and also allows additional
EM functioning of a circuit that a conventional EM analysis cannot
reveal. He shows that Tesla’s patented circuits did exactly this.
Tesla – who was originally trained in physics, before “electrical
engineering” even existed, was thus able to operate in Maxwell’s
original higher group symmetry theory, and not just in the
silly and horribly flawed old classical EM model of today.
Barrett was so impressed by this capability of Tesla that he,
Barrett, extended the methodology a bit and obtained two patents.
They are:
Terrence W. Barrett, "Active Signalling Systems," U.S. Patent
No. 5,486,833, Jan. 23, 1996. A signaling system in timefrequency
space for detecting targets in the presence of clutter and for
penetrating media. 14 U.S. patents cited. 22 claims, 37 drawing
sheets.
Terence W. Barrett, "OscillatorShuttleCircuit (OSC) Networks
for Conditioning Energy in HigherOrder Symmetry Algebraic
Topological Forms and RF Phase Conjugation," U.S. Patent No.
5,493,691. Feb. 20, 1996.
With the development of precursor engineering, then all of this
portends a great new and dramatic leap forward in physics,
whenever more legitimate scientists pick it up (such as Kanzius,
Solomon, etc.). As one pale example, I enclose a draft paper which
sets out a sort of “Manhattan Project” which could be performed by
the scientific community to very quickly solve the escalating
world energy crisis – quickly, cleanly, and permanently. And also
solve much of the global warming problem at the same time, by
eliminating most of the harmful emissions connected with
automobiles, power plants, etc. Please particularly note the
seventh program – precursor engineering. Precursor engineering is
the deliberate and direct engineering (forcefree and workfree)
of local spacetimevacuum itself before the altered vacuum is then
interacted with matter to form force fields (force is rigorously
the ongoing interaction with charged matter of such a
precursor field (massless, forcefree) in spacetimevacuum.
Finally, we point out that general relativity actually involves
extensive precursor engineering of the active spacetimevacuum.
This means that, in general relativity, the conventional positive
energy (and positive probabilities) conservation of energy,
momentum, etc. laws can be (and are) violated easily and readily.
While many physicists strongly resist even the thought of this, it
was pointed out very quickly by the great Hilbert, after
Einstein’s publication of general relativity.
Quoting Hilbert: "I assert... that for the general theory of
relativity, i.e., in the case of general invariance of the
Hamiltonian function, energy equations... corresponding to the
energy equations in orthogonally invariant theories do not exist
at all. I could even take this circumstance as the characteristic
feature of the general theory of relativity." [D. Hilbert,
Gottingen Nachrichten, Vol. 4, 1917, p. 21.].
Quoting Logunov and Loskutov: "In formulating the equivalence
principle, Einstein actually abandoned the idea of the
gravitational field as a FaradayMaxwell field, and this is
reflected in the pseudotensorial characterization of the
gravitational field that he introduced. Hilbert was the first to
draw attention to the consequences of this. … Unfortunately, …
Hilbert was evidently not understood by his contemporaries, since
neither Einstein himself nor other physicists recognized the fact
that in general relativity conservation laws for energy, momentum,
and angular momentum are in principle impossible." [A. A. Logunov
and Yu. M. Loskutov, "Nonuniqueness of the predictions of the
general theory of relativity," Sov. J. Part. Nucl., 18(3),
MayJune 1987, p. 179].
But a high caliber modern physicist will be aware of this very
odd fact. E.g., quoting Sir Roger Penrose: “We seem to have lost
those most crucial conservation laws of physics, the laws of
conservation of energy and momentum!” [Penrose then adds the
Killing symmetry arbitrarily, to get conservation again, when the
Killing vector applies and gravity is separated.]. “These
conservation laws hold only in a spacetime for which there is the
appropriate symmetry, given by the Killing vector ĸ…. [These
considerations] do not really help us in understanding what the
fate of the conservation laws will be when gravity itself becomes
an active player. We still have not regained our missing
conservation laws of energy and momentum, when gravity enters the
picture. ... This awkwardseeming fact has, since the early days
of general relativity, evoked some of the strongest objections to
that theory, and reasons for unease with it, as expressed by
numerous physicists over the years. … in fact Einstein’s theory
takes account of energymomentum conservation in a rather
sophisticated way – at least in those circumstances where such a
conservation law is most needed. …Whatever energy there is in the
gravitational field itself is to be excluded from having any
representation…” [Roger Penrose, The Road to Reality, Alfred A.
Knopf, New York, 2005, p. 457458.]
Comment: This “solution” accepted by many general
relativists as pointed out by Penrose, is to just arbitrarily toss
out the gravity and gravitational energy density of spacetime in a
given troublesome case, and the problem of nonconservation of
energy and momentum then vanishes. In short, separate the
spacetime itself from the fields, and there is no problem!
However, simply avoiding the problem itself is not solving the
problem! Considering the neglected and unaccounted giant Heaviside
energy flow always accompanying every Poynting EM energy flow, the
gravity effect is always at least of importance, and this
“solution” itself is in general nearly always untenable. Ver
documento completo: MEG AharonovBohm Effect, Watergas, Negative
Energy, Negative Probabilities, Precursor Engineering, Extending
the Scientific Method, and EM Limitations
http:www.cheniere.org
*III. Conclusión:*
Dado el gran volúmen de datos, documentación científica analizada y
estudios complementarios, bibliografía, etc...podemos afirmar, que
estamos en condiciones de *producir dispositivos de energía libre
viablles* y eficientes, que en este momento, están siendo desarrollados
por diferentes equipos distribuídos a lo largo de toda la geografía mundial.
Referencias científicas recomendadas:
· *2008 Technical Summary for Assoc. of Distinguished American
Scientists http:www.cheniere.orgtechpapersTechRpt2008.pdf**
*20 April, 2009
· MEG AharonovBohm Effect, Watergas, Negative Energy, Negative Probabilities,
Precursor Engineering, Extending the Scientific Method, and EM Limitations
http:www.cheniere.org
7 April, 2008
· *Note on the Bedini Battery Charging System now in production
http:www.cheniere.orgtechpapersBedini%20charger%20explanation.htm**
*19 February, 2008
· A Possible Approach to a Permanent Magnet SelfPowering Motor
http:www.cheniere.orgtechpapersAsymmetric%20Mag%20Motor.htm
1 July, 2007
· *General Relativistic Violation of the Conservation of Energy Law
http:www.cheniere.org
Feb. 18, 2007
· *Engineering the Active Vacuum: On the Asymmetrical
AharonovBohm Effect and Magnetic Vector Potential A vs.
Magnetic Field B:
http:www.cheniere.org
*May 2006
· *Electromagnetic Energy from the Vacuum: System
Efficiency and COP of Symmetric and Asymmetric Maxwellian Systems
http:www.cheniere.orgtechpapersCOPvsEFF23.pdf*
April 2006
· *Increasing the Coefficient of Performance of Electromagnetic
Power Systems by Extracting and Using
Excess EM Energy from the Heaviside Energy Flow Component
http:www.cheniere.org
*October 25, 2005
· *Errors and Omissions in the CEM EE Model
http:www.cheniere.org
June 27, 2005
· *CTEC Inc. 1996 report on testing one of Howard Johnson's magnetic gates
http:www.cheniere.org
Posted 20 June, 2005
· *FACT SHEETS http:www.cheniere.orgtechpapersFactSheetsindex.html*
19 August, 2004
· *Precursor Engineering: Directly Altering Physical Reality
http:www.cheniere.orgtechpapersPrecursor%20Engineering1.htm*
February, 2004
· Source Charge, Van Flandern Waterfall, and Leyton Geometry
http:www.cheniere.orgtechpapersvanflandern.htm
Dec. 2, 2003
· *Proof of a Mechanism for Cold Fusion
http:www.cheniere.org
23 April, 2003
· *SelfPowering Heat Amplifier as the Mechanism for the Final
Catastrophic Destruction of the Shuttle Columbia
http:www.cheniere.orgtechpaperscolumbia.htm**
*23 March, 2003
· *The Importance of Leyton's Hierarchies of Symmetry
http:www.cheniere.orgtechpapersleyton.htm**
*26 February, 2003
· *Patent Application (December 2001): *
Method, System and Apparatus for Conditioning Electromagnetic Potentials,
Fields, and Waves to Treat and Alter Matter
http:www.cheniere.orgpatent%20applicationupdate1.htm
*Plus*
Bedini's Discovery: Extending The Porthole Concept and the
Waddington Valley Cell Lineage Concept
(With Proposed Reason Why Present Cloning Is So Inefficient)
November 30, 2002
· *Novel Principles In The Rife Microscope And Rife's Great Secret
http:www.cheniere.orgtechpapersrifemicroscope.htm**
*Updated 10 December, 2003
*
http:www.cheniere.orgtechpapersontheprinciplesofpermissible.htm*
· *On the Principles of Permissible Overunity EM Power Systems
http:www.cheniere.orgtechpapersontheprinciplesofpermissible.htm**
*Updated 3 August, 2001
over 550 definitions and 178 pages!
includes discussion of possible mechanism for spontaneous human
combustion.
· Engines and Templates: Correcting Effects Confused as Causes
http:www.cheniere.orgtechpaperstemplates%20and%20engines.htm
· *Annotated Glossary including Math and Single Character Abbreviations
http:www.cheniere.orgtechpapersAnnotated%20Glossary.htm*
· Mechanisms for Deep Penetration of Environmental Dense Weak EM
Noise Interference Into the Body, and LongTerm Deleterious Effects Thereof
http:www.cheniere.orgtechpapersmechanismsfordeep.htm
· *EM Energy from the Vacuum: Ten Questions with Extended Answers
http:www.cheniere.orgtechpapersbearden5.pdf*
September 2000
· *Vision 2000
The New Science now emerging for the New
http:www.cheniere.orgtechpapersVision%202000%20paper.docMillennium
http:www.cheniere.orgtechpapersVision%202000%20paper.doc*
August 2000
· IC2000 Paper
On Extracting Electromagnetic Energy from the Vacuum
http:www.cheniere.orgtechpapersonextractingEM%20energy.htm
· *Extracting and Using Electromagnetic Energy from the Active Vacuum
http:www.cheniere.orgtechpapersbearden4.pdf*
· *Dark Matter or Dark Energy
http:www.cheniere.orgtechpapersDark%20Energy%20or%20Dark%20Matter.doc*
· *Bedini's Method for Forming Negative Resistors in Batteries
http:www.cheniere.orgtechpapersBedini.pdf*
· *The Unnecessary Energy Crisis: How to Solve it Quickly
http:www.cheniere.orgtechpapersUnnecessary%20Energy%20Crisis.doc*June 12, 2000
· *Giant Negentropy from the Common Dipole
http:www.cheniere.orgtechpapersGiantNegentropy.pdf*June 6, 2000
· *On Extracting Electromagnetic Energy from the Vacuum
http:www.cheniere.orgtechpaperselectromagnetic.pdf*
Tras un denso trabajo de recopilación científica y síntesis, hemos decidido, publicar el presente estudio sobre la base de exponer detalladamente toda la información “científica” y “tecnológica” disponible en este momento. Toda la línea expuesta, analiza más de 120 patentes de TESLA, así como la energía del punto "0", la lógica de radiofrecuencia diferencial y finalmente los principios científicos de la generación cuántica de energía electromagnética, o “plasma electromagnético.”
Dado el gran volúmen de datos, documentación científica analizada y estudios complementarios, bibliografía, etc...podemos afirmar, que estamos en condiciones de producir dispositivos de energía libre viablles y eficientes, que en este momento, están siendo desarrollados por diferentes equipos distribuídos a lo largo de toda la geografía mundial. “II.Exposición detallada.” 1.La base lógica de la energía libre: “Electromagnetismo y Radiofrecuencia.” Recientemente, expusimos el marco de la “unificación de la física cuántica diferencial. En dicha exposición,” señalábamos que:
La unificación nos ayudará a resolver el fenómeno de la
superconductividad a altas energías. La clave reside en la
interacción deenergías (electromagnetismo, interacciones débiles e
interacciones fuertes). Dr.Rafael LópezGuerrero, I.R.C.A.I,
http:www.ircai.eucontentmgindex.php?optioncomcontent&viewcategory&layoutblog&id1&Itemid50
Respecto a la radiofrecuencia, sabemos que existe una lógica que interelaciona, paquetes de datos en frecuencias, resonancias y armónicos, y que ésta a su vez, interactúa con los impulsos electromagnéticos.
En el Universo, la energía se transmite mediante paquetes de datos. Esa transmisión implica en sí misma, una lógica inteligente.
Lógica de frecuencias y electromagnetismo.
Todos los paquetes de datos, contienen una estructura idéntica coherente con laforma helicoidal: Frecuencias , resonancias y armónicos que interactúan con las fuerzas expuestas en el diagrama de unificación de la física.
De hecho, no es casualidad que la extrapolación teórica muestra que las tres fuerzas del modelo estándar (la interacción fuerte y las unificadas débil y electromagnética) tienen más o menos la misma intensidad a energías muy altas, y que la coincidencia mejora añadiendo la “supersimetría.” Ello, demuestra :
1º.Que los principios de Tesla, son correctos: Tesla estaba en lo cierto: Las energías libres, implican que el universo está en equilibrio.
2º.Que toda radiofrecuencia puede trnsformarse en electromagnetismo, y éste en aquella de forma simple y lógica.
3º.Que la energía del punto "0" no es otra cosa que la transformación de paquetes de datos en energía y viceversa.
4º.Que podemos ineractuar en el proceso conociendo las leyes básicas de las tres interacciones, por lo que la supersimetría implica que el espaciotiempo es relativo a la escala de curvatura de frecuencias de KönigGuerrero.
5ºPor tanto, la lógica de parámetros de datos de lainteracción entre rdiofrecuencia y energía de interacción, sigue los mismos patrones de la lógica del equilibrio de fuerzas del universo.
2.Patrones de replicación cuántica.
Una de las consecuencias de lo anteriormente expuesto, es la capacidad de replicación cuántica de cualesquiera paquetes de datos, y por tanto, la formulación del principio de replicación por “supresión de interacciones.”
“Toda estructura de paquetes de datos procedente del universo, puede replicarse a escala cuántica desde un punto B a un punto C, partiendo de un patrón de estructura de datos A, que denominamos matriz originaria.”
De esta forma, tendríamos el siguiente esquema:
De esta forma tenemos que las energías de interacción por supresión generan curvatura KG (ver diagrama de curvaturas KönigGuerrero, tendríamos que:
Podemos generar aperturas energéticas que curvan el espaciotiempo, utilizando el paradigma de la energíamasa. Dicho de forma coloquial: Podemos replicar de forma ilimitada, “paquetes de energía” partiendo de un “punto "0" ”
Podemos replicar paquetes de energía desde un punto "0"
3.Analizando las aplicaciones técnicas:
La lógica del motor de energía del punto "0".
Como puede verse, pueden replicarse, "clonarse" paquetes de energía, desde el punto "0", siguiendo la lógica arriba expuesta.
Los siguientes diagramas, muestran la mayor eficiencia en la gestion energética del punto "0".
Tal y como demuestran T.Bearden y K.Moore en System Efficiency ( http:www.cheniere.orgtechpapersCOPvsEFF23.pdf ) and Coefficient of Performance (COP) of Symmetric and Asymmetric Maxwellian Systems http:www.cheniere.orgtechpapersCOPvsEFF23.pdf
4.Demostración de viabilidad de las tecnologías TESLA:
Tal y como señala Tom Bearden, reproducimos el texto íntegro de la carta:
MEG AharonovBohm Effect, Watergas, Negative Energy, Negative
Probabilities, Precursor Engineering, Extending the Scientific
Method, and EM Limitations
Tom Bearden
7 April 2008
Dear (Correspondent),
I very much appreciate your kindness in sending me the
information, and the new work with polarized daylight is very
significant indeed!
One of these days I hope to get Prof. Michael Berry to take a
look at how we use the AharonovBohm effect in our patented
Motionless Electromagnetic Generator (MEG). We are able to use the
AharonovBohm effect to first energize the surrounding vacuum
outside the transformer core with curlfree Apotential, then
perturb the core normally so as to send out Afield perturbations
into that energized external vacuum (into its Apotential). From
the perturbed local Afield vacuum the MEG receives back (from all
directions) excess Efield energy pulses by the simple equation
dAdt – E. The result is that the local altered vacuum – when
subsequently perturbed – then sends back free Efield energy to
our unit as an extra, free energy input from the active vacuum
environment. By insuring some coherence in the received Efield
signals, we also insure that the return excess energy input is
usable EM energy from the altered local vacuumspacetime. On
my website, www.cheniere.org http:www.cheniere.org, there is
a set of drawings of how the AB process in the MEG actually works,
so that one can see it visually. See
http:www.cheniere.orgtechpapersOn%20the%20AharonovBohm%20Effect1.doc
.
As you know, force fields exist only in matter, since mass is a
component of force by the simple equation F ddt(mv). Placing m
0 in that equation shows that in massless space, “force” does
not exist. So instead of EM force fields in massless space,
instead there exist precursor “conditions of spacetime” as pointed
out by Nobelist Feynman. What we call “EM force”, then, rigorously
is the ongoing interaction of that “precursor field” with
charged matter q.
As the great John Wheeler points out, “Space acts on matter,
telling it how to move. In turn, matter reacts back on space,
telling it how to curve.” [Wheeler's principle, as stated in W.
Misner, K.S. Thorne, and J.A. Wheeler, Gravitation, W.H. Freeman
and Co., San Francisco, 1973, p. 5].
Wheeler also pointed out the dominance of the interacting
spacetime with matter and effects in matter. Quoting:
“…elementary particles represent a percentagewise almost
completely negligible change in the locally violent conditions
that characterize the vacuum...In other words, elementary
particles do not form a really basic starting point for the
description of nature. Instead, they represent a firstorder
correction to vacuum physics.”
So the AharonovBohm effect (together with many others) shows
that it is possible to directly condition or change (or
“engineer”) the local spacetime itself, and then use it to affect
the physical system embedded in that altered local spacetime.
What we call “force” is the ongoing interaction of the “condition
of spacetime itself” with matter.
The bottom line is that (1) the vacuumspacetime can first be
preconditioned locally (precursive engineering), without using
force or work (which is translation of force), and (2) then
the altered and energized vacuumspacetime can be stimulated to
provide excess EM energy freely back to the system. The system
then has TWO energy inputs: (1) the one we pay to make, and (2)
the one the surrounding activated vacuum gives us for free. So,
like a windmill in a free EM energy wind, our unit can exhibit
COP1.0, even though its energy efficiency is always less than 100%.
We are presently awaiting funding for our MEG (there are five
inventors) and when we receive that funding we will then strongly
move to put legitimate COP1.0 electrical power generating systems
on the market. That will require about a year and a half of very
intense final research and development to better and automatically
control the coherence of the return signals, etc. I’m very much
hoping I live to see the MEG on the market and being used worldwide.
And as you know, once one has COP of 3.0 or so, then with clamped
positive feedback of part of the output, one can produce an
“asymmetric” system which is “selfpowered” (more correctly, with
all its input energy freely received from the locally excited and
interacting vacuum).
So “energy from the vacuum” is no more eerie than a common
windmill or solar power cell array. Given the necessary input
energy from the active surrounding environment, the system is
legitimately permitted to function as an analogue to a common heat
pump – which has an efficiency of only about 50%, but which
normally has a COP 3.0 to 4.0. In short, the heat pump wastes
half of all its input energy from whatever source, but it receives
so much excess energy from its activated environment that it can
still output more heat energy than the electrical energy the
operator himself pays to input. No violation of thermodynamics or
of physics is involved. Instead, there is involved just a way to
directly and freely alter the local environment so it is
energized, and then to trigger it into sending free energy
into one’s system to be collected and power the loads.
Note that such asymmetrical overunity electrical systems are
specifically excluded from the normal electrical engineering
model. The Heaviside equations were deliberately symmetrized in
1892 by Lorentz, at the instigation of J. P. Morgan, just prior to
the formation of modern electrical engineering. It was done
specifically to remove the asymmetrical “energy from the
active vacuum” systems that Nikola Tesla had discovered. Tesla had
labeled them as “energy from the active medium” systems. Tesla had
just destroyed the dream of Morgan and Edison for their great DC
power empire (a DC power plant every two miles in cities and
builtup areas) by putting in practical AC generators at Niagara
Falls. Since AC could be transmitted fairly efficiently for long
distances and DC could not, then with AC power one did not require
most of those expensive DC power plants. So the world adopted AC
power stations and transmission. With that blow to his dreams of
empire, the ruthless Morgan was immediately determined to destroy
Tesla utterly and his backer Westinghouse also. And he thoroughly
accomplished both goals.
Here is just one statement by Tesla of what he intended to do.
Quoting:
"Ere many generations pass, our machinery will be driven by a
power obtainable at any point in the universe. This idea is not
novel... We find it in the delightful myth of Antheus, who derives
power from the earth; we find it among the subtle speculations of
one of your splendid mathematicians...Throughout space there is
energy. Is this energy static or kinetic? If static our hopes are
in vain; if kinetic – and this we know it is, for certain – then
it is a mere question of time when men will succeed in attaching
their machinery to the very wheelwork of nature." [Nikola Tesla,
in a speech in New York to the American Institute of Electrical
Engineers, 1891. Quoted from back cover of his biography, Margaret
Cheney, Tesla: Man Out of Time].
During an address in 1897 Tesla stated:
“We have to evolve means for obtaining energy from stores
which are forever inexhaustible, to perfect methods which do not
imply consumption and waste of any material whatever. I now feel
sure that the realization of that idea is not far off. ...the
possibilities of the development I refer to, namely, that of the
operation of engines on any point of the earth by the energy of
the medium...” [Nikola Tesla, during an address in 1897
commemorating his installation of generators at Niagara Falls.].
Sadly, my personal physical condition is so bad I cannot travel
(33 years of biological warfare modified mycoplasma poisoning,
that my own Government folks made secretly back in the late 50s in
a joint program with Canada, and then sprayed it (in Florida and
several places in Canada) for testing its dispersion. Its strength
was reduced by 2000 times, which was supposed to make it “safe” –
about like being “just a little bit pregnant”. The spraying passed
it into the mosquito population as carriers and thus unleashed
this new and terrible malady.
I caught that crazy mess in 1968 while stationed in Canada at
Camp Valcartier as the U.S. Liaison officer to the Canadian
Armament Research & Development Team. With that awful stuff buried
inside my red blood cells, the hemoglobin hardened and one’s blood
could simply not take on and transport sufficient oxygen. I was
hospitalized three times in Canada and almost died. Tests back
then revealed nothing. So No one knew what I had for 33 years,
while it slowly damaged everything in my body. I lived thanks to a
very crazy procedure that the French doctors in Quebec performed,
which – we know today – placed the organisms into a sort of
prolonged hibernation. They resurged in my body in 2001, again
almost killing me and giving me a heart attack. By sheer
coincidence, my family doctor (as a young doctor) had treated some
of the Army sergeants on that program, and found out about the
crazy BWmodified mycoplasma and the unique test to identify the
organism. He had the test in his own lab, and gave it to me – and
it proved that indeed I had the BWmodified mycoplasma in my red
blood cells.
So finally my bizarre ailment was positively identified by direct
and decisive test at the end of 2001 after my heart attack. Then
I spent 2002 as my “year on antibiotics” to get the crazy
mycoplasma organisms when they came out of the red blood cells as
a host cell was dying after its normal lifespan of three or four
months. We got rid of the mycoplasma at long last, but everything
inside me – brain, nervous system, organs, blood vessels, muscle
system, skeletal system and joints –was damaged irretrievably by
the 33 years of steady damage.
So I can stand about two minutes, walk about 100 feet, but cannot
travel. But thankfully I can drive locally and care for my beloved
wife after her stroke followed by two heart attacks.
Anyway, thank you very much for the information; Prof. Michael
Berry is one of my scientific heroes and I would dearly like to
hear him in person at that conference!
I previously sent a writeup back to IOP, which may be of some
interest to you. It opens up a vast new area of science by
extending the present scientific method itself. Please note that
negative energy was arbitrarily removed from quantum field theory
and from the Dirac electron theory by artifice in order not to
have to face the awesome implications of “negative probabilities”
mathematically. By adding back the negative energy (e.g., as per
the important and brilliant work of Prof. Dan Solomon) into
quantum field theory and Dirac electron theory, then one suddenly
is able to directly engineer the precursor spacetimevacuum flux
itself, before it interacts with matter to form forces and force
fields.
By engineering and using negative energy from the vacuum, one is
also directly engineering “negative probabilities”, and that is a
dramatic extension to the present scientific method. One can
directly change (and even “dissolve”) any “positive observed state
or condition in matter or material systems” (which “observed
state” is just a state with 100 percent positive probability when
one considers the underlying spacetime and vacuum processes with
positive energy only). By adding negative probabilities, one
reduces the 100% positive probability (the observed state or
condition) to less than 100%. With sufficient negative probability
added to the ongoing vacuumcharge interactions, the net
probability of the observed HOH state can be reduced to zero –
its total absence.
So with a little judicially used negative energy stimulated in
water, one can cause the water’s observed water molecule’s HOH
force bonds to just fall apart and disappear (in their ongoing
interaction with the locally nowaltered negative energy
vacuum and its negative probabilities). In that way, one gets H2
and O2 gas nearly freely, paying only a little switching and
control costs to condition the vacuum properly (the vacuum
conditioning itself is forcefree and workfree). With precursor
engineering and negative energynegative probabilities, one does
not have to pay for tearing the HOH bonds apart by brute force,
as is done in normal positive energypositive probabilities
electrolysis.
Applied to cancer, e.g., one also can reverse the cancerous
physical condition (such as that cancer in the human body) as
already shown by Professor Kanzius, with validation in animal
experiments already performed successfully. See
http:en.wikipedia.orgwikiJohnKanzius.
If Professor Kanzius can avoid suppression by the big
pharmaceuticals, then with followon successful human trials and
FDA approval, we will also finally have a totally different kind
of “positive cure” for cancer. And in theory, the use of
negative energy and negative probabilities method can be adapted
to cure any other illness or undesirable physical condition as
well – including such conditions as HIV, diabetes, etc. – and
eventually even mental retardation and reversal of aging.
Meanwhile, I’ve worked with several inventors who used (and are
using) negative energy to show that, by preconditioning the local
vacuum prior to its interaction with charged matter in our EM
systems, then true “excess energy freely from the vacuum” systems
can be built and utilized. Producing sharp gradient pulses of
normal EM energy across little regions of the vacuum will “pop
out” some of those filler electrons from the Dirac Sea (that is
actually the Lenz Law effect), leaving behind the emptied Dirac
holes. These are negative massenergy matter (negative mass energy
electrons, not positrons!), and so one has produced a sort of
“negative energy froth” in the local Dirac Sea. The Dirac holes
are actually what is being sought as “dark matter” by our
astrophysicists, and as source charges their associated
concomitant negative energy EM fields are what is being sought as
“dark energy”.
So the “dark matter” our astrophysicists are so desperately
seeking is easily evoked on the lab bench and studied directly.
Dark matter simply consists of Dirac holes, remaining after one
has popped out their filler electrons with sharp gradient pulses,
leaving behind the holes (again, they are negative massenergy
electrons, not positrons). So Dark Matter is actually an
engineering of the local spacetimevacuum itself; specifically, of
the Dirac Sea. As source charges, these negative mass energy
electrons (Dirac Sea Holes) emit negative energy photons, so that
their “static fields” are actually negative energy EM fields.
Of course thermodynamically they are also nonequilibrium steady
state (NESS) systems as well, consisting of constant flow of real
photons, whose energy has been extracted from the seething virtual
state vacuum via the broken symmetry of the source dipolarities.
I have one inventor friend (Bedini) who has used negative energy
(dark energy) and Dirac holes (dark matter) in his highly improved
battery charging circuits for 30 years. He is presently bringing
such highly improved battery chargers into production and they
will be going on the market. He also has released the secret of
how he (very practically) evokes and controls such negative energy
phenomenology, and now more than two dozen independent
experimenters worldwide have successfully replicated Bedini
COP1.0 systems.
Presently unknown to the scientific community, our own U.S.
Department of Energy has quietly developed and used a fabrication
(special extrusion) process to form asymmetric permanent
magnets – e.g., physically symmetrical permanent bar magnets but
with deliberately asymmetric field strengths laterally on the two
sides of each magnet – and patented it as a result of a DoE grant
to the inventor. Presently our DoE thus has been very quietly
building and controlling true selfpowering permanent magnet
motors (taking all their input energy from the seething vacuum via
the broken symmetry of the dipole in the asymmetry magnet), while
continuing to hide it from the U.S. President, the Congress, the
scientific community, and the American Public.
To see this, see the following patents:
(a) Vijay K. Chandhok and Baomin Ma. “Method for producing
a noncircular permanent magnet”. United States Patent No.
4,915,891, issued April. 10,1990.
Abstract: A method for producing a noncircular magnet
having asymmetric magnetic properties along axes thereof. A
particle charge of composition from which the magnet is to be
produced is placed in a container, heated and extruded within the
container to compact the particle charge to substantially full
density. The particle charge may include at least one rare earth
element. The particle charge may be extruded through a noncircular
extrusion die, specifically a rectangular die.
(b) For the way the Department of Energy paid to develop
having it done, and had one of the inventors repatent it, see
Vijak K. Chadhok, WO2001084569 A1 “Method for Producing through
Extrusion an Anisotropic Magnet with High Energy Product”,
International Patent, 9 Mar. 2001. Quoting: “This invention was
made with government support under a small business research and
development grant for "A Simple Process to Manufacture Grain
Aligned Permanent Magnets" awarded by the U. S. Department of
Energy (Grant No. DEFG0297ER82313). The Government has certain
rights to this invention.”
(c) Chadhok then got yet another patent himself in 2004. See
Vijak K. Chadhok, “Method for producing through extrusion an
anisotropic magnet with high energy product”, U.S. Patent No.
6,787,083 issued on Sep. 7, 2004.
Abstract: A method for producing an anisotropic magnet
with high energy product through extrusion and, more specifically,
by placing a particle charge of a composition from the which
magnet is to be produced in a noncircular container, heating the
container and particle charge and extruding the container and
particle charge through a noncircular extrusion die in such a
manner that one of the crosssectional axes or dimension of the
container and particle charge is held substantially constant
during the extrusion to compact the particle charge to
substantially full density by mechanical deformation produced
during the extrusion to achieve a magnet with anisotropic magnetic
properties along the axes or dimension thereof and, more
specifically, a high energy product along the transverse of the
smallest crosssectional dimension of the extruded magnet.
So the U.S. Department has had powerful selfpowering permanent
magnet motors since 2001 and has hidden it from the U.S.
President, the Congress, the scientific community, and the
American public.
As you are aware and as was pointed out by Nobelist Lee,
whenever we have a broken symmetry then something previously
virtual has become observable. Every charge is a priori a part
of a dipole, when one also considers its polarized surrounding
vacuum. The “magnetic pole” is actually the “magnetic charge”. In
modern physics, a tiny classical charge is actually two infinite
charges – the bare charge in the middle (infinite charge with
infinite energy) and the surrounding charge of the altered vacuum
(infinite charge with infinite energy). Our instruments peering
through the screening polarized vacuum at the bare charge in the
middle see only a finite difference, and that is the “classical”
finite value of the charge.
It is easy to evoke a proven “free EM energy flow – a real and
free EM energy wind” from the vacuum, whenever one wishes, for a
small sum (such as $10 U.S.). E.g., lay a normal permanent bar
magnet on the bench. Lay an electret on top of it so that the
Efield of the electret is at right angles to the Hfield of the
magnet. Then by the standard Poynting EM energy flow theory in
every EM text in the EM departments of every university, that
silly gadget will then sit there and freely pour out real, usable
Poynting EM energy flow S, given by S E X H.
So getting an everlasting free EM energy wind from our
vacuumspacetime environment is simple and cheap and easy.
But to separately intercept, collect, and (separately) dissipate
some of that “free EM energy wind” energy to power our loads
freely, it requires an asymmetrical “electrical windmill” system.
Well, sadly our EEs have never had such a system even in their
theory; all remaining asymmetrical Maxwellian systems in the
original Heaviside vector equations were deliberately removed by
Lorentz by his symmetrization of the Heaviside equations. So from
the very beginning, our electrical engineers have never been able
to conceive, design, build, and deploy such asymmetrical systems.
And the present standard EE model is not Maxwell’s theory!
Maxwell’s theory is 20 quaternionlike equations in 20 unknowns,
and it contains all sorts of asymmetric EM systems as well as
those highly limited symmetrical systems known to electrical
engineering. Tesla, e.g., was able to deliberately shuttle the
collected potential energy around in a circuit at will, and this
has been clearly shown by a great electrodynamicist, T. Barrett,
one of the pioneers of ultrawideband radar. See T. W. Barrett,
"Tesla's Nonlinear OscillatorShuttleCircuit (OSC) Theory,"
Annales de la Fondation Louis de Broglie, 16(1), 1991, p. 2341.
Barrett shows that EM expressed in quaternions allows shuttling
and storage of potentials in circuits, and also allows additional
EM functioning of a circuit that a conventional EM analysis cannot
reveal. He shows that Tesla’s patented circuits did exactly this.
Tesla – who was originally trained in physics, before “electrical
engineering” even existed, was thus able to operate in Maxwell’s
original higher group symmetry theory, and not just in the
silly and horribly flawed old classical EM model of today.
Barrett was so impressed by this capability of Tesla that he,
Barrett, extended the methodology a bit and obtained two patents.
They are:
Terrence W. Barrett, "Active Signalling Systems," U.S. Patent
No. 5,486,833, Jan. 23, 1996. A signaling system in timefrequency
space for detecting targets in the presence of clutter and for
penetrating media. 14 U.S. patents cited. 22 claims, 37 drawing
sheets.
Terence W. Barrett, "OscillatorShuttleCircuit (OSC) Networks
for Conditioning Energy in HigherOrder Symmetry Algebraic
Topological Forms and RF Phase Conjugation," U.S. Patent No.
5,493,691. Feb. 20, 1996.
With the development of precursor engineering, then all of this
portends a great new and dramatic leap forward in physics,
whenever more legitimate scientists pick it up (such as Kanzius,
Solomon, etc.). As one pale example, I enclose a draft paper which
sets out a sort of “Manhattan Project” which could be performed by
the scientific community to very quickly solve the escalating
world energy crisis – quickly, cleanly, and permanently. And also
solve much of the global warming problem at the same time, by
eliminating most of the harmful emissions connected with
automobiles, power plants, etc. Please particularly note the
seventh program – precursor engineering. Precursor engineering is
the deliberate and direct engineering (forcefree and workfree)
of local spacetimevacuum itself before the altered vacuum is then
interacted with matter to form force fields (force is rigorously
the ongoing interaction with charged matter of such a
precursor field (massless, forcefree) in spacetimevacuum.
Finally, we point out that general relativity actually involves
extensive precursor engineering of the active spacetimevacuum.
This means that, in general relativity, the conventional positive
energy (and positive probabilities) conservation of energy,
momentum, etc. laws can be (and are) violated easily and readily.
While many physicists strongly resist even the thought of this, it
was pointed out very quickly by the great Hilbert, after
Einstein’s publication of general relativity.
Quoting Hilbert: "I assert... that for the general theory of
relativity, i.e., in the case of general invariance of the
Hamiltonian function, energy equations... corresponding to the
energy equations in orthogonally invariant theories do not exist
at all. I could even take this circumstance as the characteristic
feature of the general theory of relativity." [D. Hilbert,
Gottingen Nachrichten, Vol. 4, 1917, p. 21.].
Quoting Logunov and Loskutov: "In formulating the equivalence
principle, Einstein actually abandoned the idea of the
gravitational field as a FaradayMaxwell field, and this is
reflected in the pseudotensorial characterization of the
gravitational field that he introduced. Hilbert was the first to
draw attention to the consequences of this. … Unfortunately, …
Hilbert was evidently not understood by his contemporaries, since
neither Einstein himself nor other physicists recognized the fact
that in general relativity conservation laws for energy, momentum,
and angular momentum are in principle impossible." [A. A. Logunov
and Yu. M. Loskutov, "Nonuniqueness of the predictions of the
general theory of relativity," Sov. J. Part. Nucl., 18(3),
MayJune 1987, p. 179].
But a high caliber modern physicist will be aware of this very
odd fact. E.g., quoting Sir Roger Penrose: “We seem to have lost
those most crucial conservation laws of physics, the laws of
conservation of energy and momentum!” [Penrose then adds the
Killing symmetry arbitrarily, to get conservation again, when the
Killing vector applies and gravity is separated.]. “These
conservation laws hold only in a spacetime for which there is the
appropriate symmetry, given by the Killing vector ĸ…. [These
considerations] do not really help us in understanding what the
fate of the conservation laws will be when gravity itself becomes
an active player. We still have not regained our missing
conservation laws of energy and momentum, when gravity enters the
picture. ... This awkwardseeming fact has, since the early days
of general relativity, evoked some of the strongest objections to
that theory, and reasons for unease with it, as expressed by
numerous physicists over the years. … in fact Einstein’s theory
takes account of energymomentum conservation in a rather
sophisticated way – at least in those circumstances where such a
conservation law is most needed. …Whatever energy there is in the
gravitational field itself is to be excluded from having any
representation…” [Roger Penrose, The Road to Reality, Alfred A.
Knopf, New York, 2005, p. 457458.]
Comment: This “solution” accepted by many general
relativists as pointed out by Penrose, is to just arbitrarily toss
out the gravity and gravitational energy density of spacetime in a
given troublesome case, and the problem of nonconservation of
energy and momentum then vanishes. In short, separate the
spacetime itself from the fields, and there is no problem!
However, simply avoiding the problem itself is not solving the
problem! Considering the neglected and unaccounted giant Heaviside
energy flow always accompanying every Poynting EM energy flow, the
gravity effect is always at least of importance, and this
“solution” itself is in general nearly always untenable. Ver
documento completo: MEG AharonovBohm Effect, Watergas, Negative
Energy, Negative Probabilities, Precursor Engineering, Extending
the Scientific Method, and EM Limitations
http:www.cheniere.orgtechpapersMEG%20AB%20watergas%20neg%20energy%20precursor%20eng.doc
*III. Conclusión:*
Dado el gran volúmen de datos, documentación científica analizada y estudios complementarios, bibliografía, etc...podemos afirmar, que estamos en condiciones de *producir dispositivos de energía libre viablles* y eficientes, que en este momento, están siendo desarrollados por diferentes equipos distribuídos a lo largo de toda la geografía mundial.
Referencias científicas recomendadas:
· *2008 Technical Summary for Assoc. of Distinguished American
Scientists http:www.cheniere.orgtechpapersTechRpt2008.pdf**
*20 April, 2009
· MEG AharonovBohm Effect, Watergas, Negative Energy, Negative Probabilities, Precursor Engineering, Extending the Scientific Method, and EM Limitations http:www.cheniere.orgtechpapersMEG%20AB%20watergas%20neg%20energy%20precursor%20eng.doc
7 April, 2008
· *Note on the Bedini Battery Charging System now in production http:www.cheniere.orgtechpapersBedini%20charger%20explanation.htm**
*19 February, 2008
· A Possible Approach to a Permanent Magnet SelfPowering Motor http:www.cheniere.orgtechpapersAsymmetric%20Mag%20Motor.htm
1 July, 2007
· *General Relativistic Violation of the Conservation of Energy Law http:www.cheniere.orgtechpapersGeneral%20Relativistic%20Violation%20of%20the%20Conservation%20of%20Energy%20Law.doc*
Feb. 18, 2007
· *Engineering the Active Vacuum: On the Asymmetrical AharonovBohm Effect and Magnetic Vector Potential A vs. Magnetic Field B: http:www.cheniere.orgtechpapersOn%20the%20AharonovBohm%20Effect1.doc**
*May 2006
· *Electromagnetic Energy from the Vacuum: System Efficiency and COP of Symmetric and Asymmetric Maxwellian Systems http:www.cheniere.orgtechpapersCOPvsEFF23.pdf*
April 2006
· *Increasing the Coefficient of Performance of Electromagnetic Power Systems by Extracting and Using Excess EM Energy from the Heaviside Energy Flow Component http:www.cheniere.orgtechpapersPPA%20Increasing%20COP%20by%20addnl%20extractn%20from%20flow1a.DOC**
*October 25, 2005
· *Errors and Omissions in the CEM EE Model http:www.cheniere.orgtechpapersCEM%20Errors%20%20final%20paper%20complete%20w%20longer%20abstract4.doc*
June 27, 2005
· *CTEC Inc. 1996 report on testing one of Howard Johnson's magnetic gates http:www.cheniere.orgtechpapersHJLabMemo1%2811%20Jun%2096%29.doc*
Posted 20 June, 2005
· *FACT SHEETS http:www.cheniere.orgtechpapersFactSheetsindex.html*
19 August, 2004
· *Precursor Engineering: Directly Altering Physical Reality http:www.cheniere.orgtechpapersPrecursor%20Engineering1.htm*
February, 2004
· Source Charge, Van Flandern Waterfall, and Leyton Geometry http:www.cheniere.orgtechpapersvanflandern.htm
Dec. 2, 2003
· *Proof of a Mechanism for Cold Fusion http:www.cheniere.orgtechpapersProof%20of%20a%20Mechanism%20for%20Cold%20Fusion.doc*
23 April, 2003
· *SelfPowering Heat Amplifier as the Mechanism for the Final Catastrophic Destruction of the Shuttle Columbia http:www.cheniere.orgtechpaperscolumbia.htm**
*23 March, 2003
· *The Importance of Leyton's Hierarchies of Symmetry http:www.cheniere.orgtechpapersleyton.htm**
*26 February, 2003
· *Patent Application (December 2001): *
Method, System and Apparatus for Conditioning Electromagnetic Potentials, Fields, and Waves to Treat and Alter Matter http:www.cheniere.orgpatent%20applicationupdate1.htm
*Plus*
Bedini's Discovery: Extending The Porthole Concept and the Waddington Valley Cell Lineage Concept (With Proposed Reason Why Present Cloning Is So Inefficient)
November 30, 2002
· *Novel Principles In The Rife Microscope And Rife's Great Secret http:www.cheniere.orgtechpapersrifemicroscope.htm**
*Updated 10 December, 2003
*
http:www.cheniere.orgtechpapersontheprinciplesofpermissible.htm*
· *On the Principles of Permissible Overunity EM Power Systems http:www.cheniere.orgtechpapersontheprinciplesofpermissible.htm**
*Updated 3 August, 2001
over 550 definitions and 178 pages!
includes discussion of possible mechanism for spontaneous human combustion.
· Engines and Templates: Correcting Effects Confused as Causes http:www.cheniere.orgtechpaperstemplates%20and%20engines.htm
· *Annotated Glossary including Math and Single Character Abbreviations http:www.cheniere.orgtechpapersAnnotated%20Glossary.htm*
· Mechanisms for Deep Penetration of Environmental Dense Weak EM Noise Interference Into the Body, and LongTerm Deleterious Effects Thereof http:www.cheniere.orgtechpapersmechanismsfordeep.htm
· *EM Energy from the Vacuum: Ten Questions with Extended Answers http:www.cheniere.orgtechpapersbearden5.pdf*
September 2000
· *Vision 2000
The New Science now emerging for the New http:www.cheniere.orgtechpapersVision%202000%20paper.docMillennium http:www.cheniere.orgtechpapersVision%202000%20paper.doc*
August 2000
· IC2000 Paper
On Extracting Electromagnetic Energy from the Vacuum http:www.cheniere.orgtechpapersonextractingEM%20energy.htm
· *Extracting and Using Electromagnetic Energy from the Active Vacuum http:www.cheniere.orgtechpapersbearden4.pdf*
· *Dark Matter or Dark Energy http:www.cheniere.orgtechpapersDark%20Energy%20or%20Dark%20Matter.doc*
· *Bedini's Method for Forming Negative Resistors in Batteries http:www.cheniere.orgtechpapersBedini.pdf*
· *The Unnecessary Energy Crisis: How to Solve it Quickly
http:www.cheniere.orgtechpapersUnnecessary%20Energy%20Crisis.doc*June 12, 2000
· *Giant Negentropy from the Common Dipole
http:www.cheniere.orgtechpapersGiantNegentropy.pdf*June 6, 2000
· *On Extracting Electromagnetic Energy from the Vacuum
http:www.cheniere.orgtechpaperselectromagnetic.pdf*
|
